Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Avatar changes when from offline to online #32090

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor

@anyongjitiger anyongjitiger commented Nov 28, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #28518
PROPOSAL: #28518 (comment)

Tests

  1. Launch app
  2. Tap on profile---Preferences
  3. Toggle on forced offline
  4. Tab FAB and start chat
  5. Input email with default avatar and tab on create chat
  6. Look at the avatar in the report
  7. Tap on profile---Preferences
  8. Toggle off forced offline
  9. Go back to the chat, look at the avatar and make sure it will not change.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA steps

QA Steps

  1. Launch app
  2. Tap on profile---Preferences
  3. Toggle on forced offline
  4. Tab FAB and start chat
  5. Input email with default avatar and tab on create chat
  6. Look at the avatar in the report
  7. Tap on profile---Preferences
  8. Toggle off forced offline
  9. Go back to the chat, look at the avatar and make sure it will not change.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android.web.mp4
iOS: Native
ios.native.-.01.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios.web.-.01.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mp4

@anyongjitiger anyongjitiger requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2023 06:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from jjcoffee and removed request for a team November 28, 2023 06:52
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2023

@jjcoffee Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jjcoffee
I'm sorry, I accidentally closed the previous pull request.
Closed PR
I have updated the code and sign all my commits according to your suggestions. Please review.
Sorry again.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! I'll take a look tomorrow.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Nov 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-native-2023-11-27_12.03.43.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome-2023-11-27_11.57.58.mp4
iOS: Native
ios-native-2023-11-27_15.32.09.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-safari-2023-11-27_15.28.54.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
desktop-chrome-2023-11-27_11.53.04.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-app-2023-11-27_15.34.25.mp4

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@anyongjitiger As I mentioned on the previous PR, please link to the issue itself next to the $, rather than your proposal.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

There are some special cases, such as deleting a custom avatar, where the updated user ID from the backend is used to calculate the avatar URL. In such cases, it is necessary to recalculate the original user ID using the user's email.

@anyongjitiger Just tested this case that you mentioned on the closed PR, but it doesn't seem to work:

desktop-chrome-remove-avatar-2023-11-29_15.43.20.mp4

const accountIDHashBucket = ((accountID % CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT) + 1) as AvatarRange;

let accountIDHashBucket: AvatarRange;
if (avatarURL && /images\/avatars\/default-avatar_\d+\./.test(avatarURL)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm convinced this can be tidied up 😉 Let's only use one regex pattern and we probably don't need to test for it first if we're going to match later anyway.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, I have removed it.

const accountIDHashBucket = ((accountID % CONST.DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT) + 1) as AvatarRange;

let accountIDHashBucket: AvatarRange;
if (avatarURL && /images\/avatars\/default-avatar_\d+\./.test(avatarURL)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's also add an explanatory comment here as it won't be super clear why we're extracting the ID from avatarURL.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment added

if (Number(accountID) === CONST.ACCOUNT_ID.CONCIERGE) {
return CONST.CONCIERGE_ICON_URL;
}

let email; let originAccountID;
if (allPersonalDetails?.[accountID]) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment also needed here to explain why this code is here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment added

@anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are some special cases, such as deleting a custom avatar, where the updated user ID from the backend is used to calculate the avatar URL. In such cases, it is necessary to recalculate the original user ID using the user's email.

@anyongjitiger Just tested this case that you mentioned on the closed PR, but it doesn't seem to work:

desktop-chrome-remove-avatar-2023-11-29_15.43.20.mp4

@jjcoffee
It seems that the backend returned a default avatar, and it used the avatar of "newDot" instead of "oldDot".
This is the reason why the avatar changed twice after deleting it.
Do we need to change the original method when deleting avatars, instead of following what is written in the comments?

comment: // We want to use the old dot avatar here as this affects both platforms.

截屏2023-11-30 09 51 56

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

// We want to use the old dot avatar here as this affects both platforms.
const defaultAvatar = UserUtils.getDefaultAvatarURL(currentUserAccountID, false);

@anyongjitiger Looking into this a bit more, this was introduced in this PR, it's possible that I misunderstood the code and actually it's correct for the default to be isNewDot=false, as they renamed this function from getOldDotDefaultAvatar. Can you test with that, and also make sure the steps on that PR also pass?

@anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jjcoffee
I tested the scenario in the PR, and when I set isNewDot to true, it appears to be working fine.

video.mov

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Dec 1, 2023

@anyongjitiger Great, thanks! To clarify, is that with reverting the default isNewDot = true back to isNewDot = false?

Can you also address my other comments?

@anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anyongjitiger Great, thanks! To clarify, is that with reverting the default isNewDot = true back to isNewDot = false?

@jjcoffee

No, it's isNewDot = true here

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Dec 4, 2023

Okay I've tested and I don't see any issues in oldDot when deleting a custom avatar (even when the avatar ID exceeds OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT (which is 8)). So I think we're good to just remove the isNewDot param if you agree? (Don't forget to update all instances of getDefaultAvatarURL to remove the extra param).

Please can you also update the linked issue in the description (after the $) so that it links to the issue and not your proposal? Thanks!

if (allPersonalDetails?.[accountID]) {
if (allPersonalDetails[accountID].login) {
email = allPersonalDetails[accountID].login;
} else if (allPersonalDetails[accountID].displayName) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder how useful this is, since the displayName could have changed and may no longer be an email?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I have already updated my PR. Thank you.

}
}
if (email) {
originAccountID = generateAccountID(email);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I understand right, I think this would clearer if it was named originalOptimisticAccountID?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I have updated it to originalOptimisticAccountID.


// When we create a chat with a new user, an optimistic ID is used, and the avatar is generated based on it.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make the comment more concise, it's a bit too long I think.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I have updated the comment.

@anyongjitiger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay I've tested and I don't see any issues in oldDot when deleting a custom avatar (even when the avatar ID exceeds OLD_DEFAULT_AVATAR_COUNT (which is 8)). So I think we're good to just remove the isNewDot param if you agree? (Don't forget to update all instances of getDefaultAvatarURL to remove the extra param).

Please can you also update the linked issue in the description (after the $) so that it links to the issue and not your proposal? Thanks!

@jjcoffee
I have removed the isNewDot param and updated the linked issue.
Please review, thank you.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Dec 5, 2023

Thanks! Code is looking good, I will just give it a retest tomorrow and then we should be good to go.

Copy link
Contributor

@jjcoffee jjcoffee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests well, LGTM!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 6, 2023

🎯 @jjcoffee, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #32547.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Dec 6, 2023

@anyongjitiger Sorry just noticed you left a trailing #issue in the issue link, which is breaking automation. Can you remove that so that it's just the link to the issue?

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Dec 6, 2023

@Julesssss All yours!

Julesssss
Julesssss previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2023
Onyx.connect({
key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST,
callback: (val) => (allPersonalDetails = _.isEmpty(val) ? {} : val),
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The link doesn't work for me for some reason 😅 Can you post some more detail here maybe?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bump on this question

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Managed to get the link to load by pasting it into a chat with myself on Slack! 😆

As far as I can tell we aren't memoizing any of the calls to getDefaultAvatarURL so I don't think the issue is particularly relevant here. Many of the calls to getDefaultAvatarURL are also from ReportUtils which also uses this pattern so it wouldn't be a very useful optimization 😄

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Julesssss Friendly bump on the above - I think we should be good to merge!

@Julesssss Julesssss merged commit ab138ee into Expensify:main Dec 15, 2023
20 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.14-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.14-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@situchan situchan mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2023
58 tasks
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.4.14-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

// But the avatar link still corresponds to the original ID-generated link. So we extract the SVG image number from the backend's link instead of using the user ID directly
let accountIDHashBucket: AvatarRange;
if (avatarURL) {
const match = avatarURL.match(/(?<=default-avatar_)\d+(?=\.)/);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have one more default avatar prefix avatar_ which is missed here, that caused a regression more details here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants